Friday, November 30, 2018

Legal Tech Conferences 101

There are choices upon choices when it comes to legal tech conferences. How exactly does one sift through all of the available options? This month we asked our panelists to provide some of their best practices when it comes to choosing legal tech conferences.

Our Panelists

Alexander Paykin (AP), Steve Embry (SE), Gyi Tsakalakis (GT), Jim Pauli (JP), and Tucker Cottingham (TC).

What are the legal tech conferences you make it a point to attend every year?

AP: While I try to attend quite a few, the two I make it a point to never miss are the Clio Cloud Conference & ABA TECHSHOW. ABA TECHSHOW gives me a broad overview of the newest technology available to the legal industry. There, I can see a showcase of both hardware and software, as well as unique emerging products. The Clio Conference is a much more hands-on event where I get to corner the developers and demand features, as well as see the various integrations that work with the practice management system that runs my entire firm (Clio). Basically, at the Clio Conference, I look for all of the vendors that tie in with Clio and look to get the Clio developers to add features I want or need. At TECHSHOW, I look for other unrelated technology, such as hardware (scanners, laptops, telephone hardware, stand-alone software) and various new services.

SE: ABA TECHSHOW is probably the first one that comes to mind. If you’ve never been to a legal tech conference, I would be sure to go to this one. It’s a little more low key and welcoming than some of the others. Great place to meet people and get a handle on what’s going on. If you want to be on the cutting edge, then the Clio conference is the place to be. Always lots of energy, great keynotes, and well-planned. Third would be the one put on by the Association of Law Librarians in the summer. Law librarians sit on the edge between law firms and legal department and technology and as a result, they are quite knowledgeable of real-world issues. There’s a host of others but in my mind, these are the three “can’t miss” ones.

GT: ABA TECHSHOW, Clio Cloud Conference, Lawyernomics (assuming Internet Brands continues the tradition).

JP: NCSC’s eCourts/CTC.

AS: I usually make it a point to attend ABA TECHSHOW, but I’ve heard great things about other legal tech conferences as well, including Clio Con, Lawyernomics, MILOfest, and others that I haven’t had an opportunity to attend yet.

What are 3 things that make a good legal tech conference?

AP: A legal tech conference needs a few things to be successful: Primarily, it needs a quality vendor expo so that attendees can be introduced to all of the newest and most exciting products and services. Second, it needs quality CLEs that provide training to the attendees on how to embrace the new technology… While you’re at it, a nice venue in a convenient city never hurt…

SE: Good question, since it’s not always easy to define. Obviously good content, that’s a given. But more than that, there has to be an opportunity for people to talk and learn from one another, an openness and commitment by the organizers to not only let that happen but to encourage it. Location can be important but not in the typical sense. While exotic locations are nice, most people want to go someplace that’s easy to get to and which is not terribly expensive.

GT: The people, the people, the people. But seriously, it’s the people. Second to the people, look for conferences that expressly limit “pitching from the stage.” You don’t want to travel all that way to “get sold.”

AS: I am a firm believer that you need to evaluate for yourself which is the best legal tech conference for you to attend, based on where you are at currently with using technology in your practice, what your goals for the conference are, who the speakers at the conference will be, what vendors will be attending, what other activities are planned in conjunction with the conference, as well as who the other attendees are. Whether a legal tech conference is successful for you also depends on how much you put into it—reviewing the agenda before you go and make a preliminary plan about what sessions you want to attend, which vendors you want to visit, what other attendees you want to network with, and how you plan to follow up after the event and/or implement what you’ve learned can all make or break the conference experience for you. For me right now, a good legal tech conference provides up to date information about technology in the legal space with dynamic speakers, fosters opportunities to network with both attendees and presenters, and makes it possible to learn about legal tech in settings other than just talking heads lecture sessions.

JP: Truly innovative solutions that solve business issues, connectivity/networking, and good metric- based comparison of products—vendors who can clearly present solution differentiators.

TC: Attorneys are under increasing pressure to reduce overhead and increase efficiency in order to meet client expectations and remain competitive. Good legal tech conferences offer an opportunity to learn about the tools that are available and give attorneys a chance to see the technology in action and talk with the companies that are offering the solutions. It’s also a great way to learn about how other firms in your practice area are leveraging the available technology and to see what new developments are coming down the pike. A good legal tech conference should have industry-leading vendors, practice area-specific sessions about to leverage technology, and, of course, it’s always nice to get some MCLE credit.

What do you think is the future for legal tech conferences: smaller regional ones, online ones, more/fewer exhibitors, etc.?

AP: More legal tech conferences are going to follow Clio’s model and be both hosted and centered around a particular practice management system. After all, while I may be generally interested in all new tech, I am most likely to engage with the tech that is compatible with my existing technology to create a single consistent platform. Walking around at Clio Con, I know that all of the vendors are compatible with my main software platform. Equally important, such a conference can provide tech support and feature requests in a much more focused manner, since the attendees are also the organizer’s clients and the organizers are the developers. That being said, ABA TECHSHOW isn’t going away anytime soon, as it is the gold standard for the wide-angle global view of legal tech.

SE: I think the demise of the really big conferences has been a bit exaggerated. People still come to the big ones, if for no other reason, they know there will be plenty of opportunity to network—i.e., other people are there. I have definitely seen a decline in folks exhibiting in halls, however. The trend seems to be for those with products or services to sell attending and networking but not exhibiting. The other trends I think we will see more and more of is speakers attending and presenting live stream instead of live. I have done several presentations this way and it allows you to get better speakers for less cost.

GT: There’s really no substitute for face-to-face networking. While the popularity of online content will continue to grow, the real value of the conferences is sitting down with friends old and new.

AS: I’m not sure there is a single answer to this question, because I think it depends on the needs of each audience. There may be a place for a mix of all of these things. I don’t think legal tech conferences will ever all go online, even if there is some component of online learning for those who can’t attend a conference in person, but the value of talking to people one on one and having that real-time face to face interaction can’t be underestimated. The networking component is one of the main reasons I attend conferences, so moving them all online would take a lot away from the experience, I think. Smaller, more regional conferences might help address specific problems or needs and might make it easier for people to attend legal tech conferences because of a reduced need to travel, but I don’t see the national conferences going away any time soon.

JP:

  1. Virtual conferences.
  2. Larger, less expensive conferences. Multiple small conferences are too expensive for vendors.
  3. Perhaps an east coast, middle of the country, west coast rotation.
  4. Find less expensive venues.
  5. Help vendors sell products so then they will be sponsors and reduce costs.

If someone has never been to a legal tech conference, which one would you recommend that he or he go to first and why?

AP: If they use Clio for their practice management system or if they currently don’t have a practice management system, Clio is the ideal conference. It will give the attendee a very good understanding of how a fully integrated set of software should function. If you’re using a different practice management system, then either a conference hosted by that company (if they have one), or ABA TECHSHOW, which will at least provide general info on all tech.

SE: TECHSHOW, without a doubt. Some of the other big conferences can be overwhelming and less inviting, particularly if you don’t know a lot of people. TECHSHOW goes out of its way to be welcoming and inclusive, sometimes at the cost of being a little less sophisticated than perhaps some of the others. But that’s good. It still has a “mom and pop” feel to it.

GT: I’d recommend ABA TECHSHOW. It really hits the spectrum of what’s out there in terms of technology and subject matter experts sharing what they know.

AS: Since I haven’t attended a lot of the other legal tech conferences aside from TECHSHOW, I can’t speak specifically about the pros and cons of those other events, but I would recommend that if you haven’t been to a legal tech conference before, you take some time to research the different conferences; see who is speaking, what topics will be covered, what other events or activities are available, who typically attends, etc. to get an idea which conference might be right for you. Every conference has a bit of a different vibe or personality, and the attendees may be different at each conference. Or you might have specific tech needs that you want to address. You’ll also want to talk to people who have attended the conference in the past to find out what the pros and cons of each conference are. For example, I stopped going to Legal Tech NY several years ago because, at the time, it seemed far too focused on e-discovery and not much else, the educational sessions didn’t interest me, and it was too crowded. It just didn’t meet my needs at the time.

What’s the best way to become a speaker at a legal tech show?

AP: Submit a good proposal.

SE: It’s like a jury trial or law school exam: sometimes you can try really hard and not succeed. Other times you can put forth less effort and win. I think having something relevant to say, writing, doing other presentations, and networking are keys. And it helps to be a good presenter. And to have patience. Most of the shows just don’t grab people off the street: you have to be present, get to know people, and be relevant. In short, pay some dues!

GT: Start sharing your knowledge! Publish. Connect. Nurture professional relationships.

AS: I’m not sure I can offer the “best” way, but here are some of my recommendations:

  1. First, check to see if the legal tech conference you are interested in has a call for speakers or if it accepts proposals for presentations at the conference. Read the qualifications and instructions carefully and be sure to submit your proposal on time.
  2. If you don’t meet the qualifications for speaking at a particular conference, try another conference, or offer to do a legal tech presentation for another organization, such as your local bar association, to build your speaking credentials.
  3. Include your speaking and/or writing credentials (particularly on legal tech topics) in your bio
  4. Publicize the fact that you speak on legal technology topics
  5. Write on legal technology topics on your website, your blog, or for other legal publications
  6. Network! Meet influencers in the legal technology world and let them know you would like to speak; the more people you know, who know you and know you are interested in and knowledgeable about these topics, the better your chances will be, especially if you get known as a great speaker.
  7. Consider teaming up with someone who is more well-known to do a legal tech presentation or submit a proposal—offer to do more of the work (materials, slide presentation, demo recordings, etc) in exchange for working with them
  8. If you don’t get accepted the first time, don’t give up!

JP:

  1. Be a sponsor.
  2. Have something unique or interesting to present.
  3. Be a great showman!

The post Legal Tech Conferences 101 appeared first on Law Technology Today.

LawTechnologyTodayOrg?d=yIl2AUoC8zA LawTechnologyTodayOrg?d=qj6IDK7rITs


source http://www.lawtechnologytoday.org/2018/11/legal-tech-conferences-101/

Legal Technology and Innovation in 2019

Join us for Legal Technology and Innovation in 2019 for a quick tour through some of the frontiers of legal technology and innovation in the legal industry.

Hear from the director of the technology and innovation platform at Thomson Reuters Legal Executive Institute as he shares the latest in artificial intelligence developments, the growing use of data analytics in legal practice and the business of law, new legal services business models, and much more.

David will also include a review of some of the best experts, blogs, publications, and events that lawyers can follow to keep up on the latest tech developments.

Learning Objectives:

  • Identify where new technologies and innovations affect the legal industry
  • Understand the impact of artificial intelligence and analytics
  • Discover the best blogs, events, and experts to follow to keep up

Join us:

Wednesday, December 5th
2:00pm – 2:30pm ET

Free Registration

Sponsored by:

Please note: this is a non-CLE session.
Feature image from Shutterstock.

The post Legal Technology and Innovation in 2019 appeared first on Law Technology Today.

LawTechnologyTodayOrg?d=yIl2AUoC8zA LawTechnologyTodayOrg?d=qj6IDK7rITs


source http://www.lawtechnologytoday.org/2018/11/legal-technology-and-innovation-in-2019/

Thursday, November 29, 2018

Party Bus Sued for Fatal Shooting in Santa Monica

After a party bus evening went tragically wrong last year, numerous plaintiffs have filed suit against the party bus company and the city of Santa Monica. Plaintiffs are suing over the shooting death of De'Ommie de la Cruz, including the deceased family as well as friends that witnessed the shooting. They are seeking unspecified damages.

Fatal Party Bus Incident Near the Santa Monica Pier

On November 3, 2017, De'Ommie de la Cruz and other female passengers were on a bus operating by Lion Limousine, celebrating a friend's birthday. At about 1 AM, they asked the driver for a bathroom break. The driver complied and pulled into a parking lot near the Santa Monica pier.

Nearby were men on another party bus, who appeared to the women to be gang members. The women were reticent about de-boarding, fearing their safety, but the bus driver allegedly told them this would be the last bathroom stop of the night. Gunfire soon ensued, and de la Cruz was shot multiple times. The bus driver drove to the Santa Monica Police Station. According to the suit, the officers would not administer aid to de la Cruz. Further angering the women, they allege the police did not allowed them to use the police station restroom, and instead were told to sit on the ground, "as if they were criminals," so their photos could be taken.

Common Carrier Liability

According to the lawsuit, Lion Limousine is being sued because it is alleged they knew, or should have known, that the bus driver was incompetent or unfit to drive. Party buses, like most buses, are considered "common carriers" and must exercise a very high degree of care and diligence with regard to passenger safety. The crux of this case will likely turn on whether the driver's actions to pull over near the other bus was unreasonably negligent, as well as whether it was negligent for the bus driver to drive to the police station instead of a hospital.

If you or someone you love has been injured in a party bus, or other common carrier accident, contact a local personal injury attorney. These sorts of lawsuits can be complicated, and a legal adviser can best navigate local laws and ordinances to help you get the relief you need.

Related Resources:

Injured?d=yIl2AUoC8zA Injured?d=qj6IDK7rITs Injured?i=dOPDiRqO_Ts:xS4LLXlEdXs:gIN9vF


source http://blogs.findlaw.com/injured/2018/11/party-bus-sued-for-fatal-shooting-in-santa-monica.html

Watch: New York E-filing Webinar

It’s been almost two decades since New York first introduced eFiling and lawyers are still trying to find a better way to use this technology. The problem with technology, especially legal technology, is that it doesn’t play well with others.

For example, eFiling into NYSCEF is a huge step forward for saving costs and allowing attorneys to work and eFile from anywhere.  However, you end up doing more work by retyping party information, converting documents to PDF, saving and uploading documents, and making sure you track all the costs manually.  You find yourself spending more time eFiling than walking to the court house because the technology was developed in a vacuum. What’s the point of technology if it doesn’t help you be a better lawyer?

The best practice or case management systems allow you to leverage the information you’ve already entered with document automation, time tracking and other integrated services such as E-filing. In this video, you’ll discover how to keep all of your client information, documents, calendars, emails and billing data all in one place.

Learning Objectives:

  • Effectively implementing a practice management software in boutique law firms
  • Understanding E-filing requirements in New York
  • How to reduce errors in E-filing by simplifying the E-filing process
  • How to integrate E-filing with your practice management software

Sponsored by:

Speakers:

Natasha Malinsky –  Boutique Law Firm Practice Management Specialist at LEAP

Natasha is a Boutique Law Firm Practice Management Specialist with LEAP. Natasha has been assisting small law firms throughout the state of New York for several years. Natasha understands the struggles of running a business and enjoys working with other small businesses to increase efficiency and profitability.

Eunbin Rii – VP of Product Development at InfoTrack

Eunbin Rii is the Vice President of Product Development at InfoTrack, an E-filing software solution. Eunbin has also served as Litigation Counsel for ARDC, the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, investigating and prosecuting attorneys for professional misconduct. Eunbin received his JD cum laude from Loyola University Chicago School of Law.

The post Watch: New York E-filing Webinar appeared first on Law Technology Today.

LawTechnologyTodayOrg?d=yIl2AUoC8zA LawTechnologyTodayOrg?d=qj6IDK7rITs


source http://www.lawtechnologytoday.org/2018/11/watch-new-york-e-filing-webinar/

Judges Say You’re Missing Cases. Here’s How A.I. Can Help

All litigators fear missing a critical case—it’s what keeps us up researching at 2:00 AM, trying one last search just to be safe. But how often does it actually happen? According to Casetext’s recent report, more often than you think. And when it does, it really makes a difference.

We surveyed over 100 federal and state judges and uncovered some pretty shocking statistics.

  • Every single judge we surveyed said that they or their clerks have discovered relevant precedent that the parties before them missed.
  • Over a quarter of the judges surveyed (27%) said that they or their clerks catch missing precedents the attorneys should have cited “most of the time” or “almost always.”
  • More than two-thirds of the judges (68%) said that attorneys missing cases before them has materially impacted the outcome of a motion or proceeding.

According to the judiciary, attorneys are not researching as thoroughly as they seem to think they are. One judge commented that he would grade the overall quality of the research he sees a C+. Another told us, “Even excellent lawyers miss things, and sometimes it materially impacts the outcome.”

One reason even great lawyers are not so great at legal research? The tools they’re relying on are not set up to solve for this problem. That’s why attorneys—and the judiciary—are turning to new technology, like A.I., to help them find the most relevant cases, first.

In a post on the American Judges Association blog, Judge Kevin Burke says: “In a perfect world, litigants would cite to all relevant case law in their briefs. In the real world, litigants often do not. A new research tool, CARA [Casetext’s A.I. search technology] can help judges and their clerks quickly find important case law that the parties may have overlooked.” A recent study with the National Legal Research Group illustrated just how much A.I. can help: that researching with A.I. found 21% more relevant cases (and finished their research 25% faster) than attorneys using traditional search technology.

To learn more about the survey, you can download the report “The Prevalence of Missing Precedents” here.

If you’d like to try A.I. legal research for yourself, start a 14-day free trial of Casetext here.

The post Judges Say You’re Missing Cases. Here’s How A.I. Can Help appeared first on Law Technology Today.

LawTechnologyTodayOrg?d=yIl2AUoC8zA LawTechnologyTodayOrg?d=qj6IDK7rITs


source http://www.lawtechnologytoday.org/2018/11/heres-how-a-i-can-help/

Wednesday, November 28, 2018

Family Sues Mexico Resort for Daughter's Drowning

A family vacation in Mexico turned deadly for one Wisconsin family, and they've filed a wrongful death lawsuit in a Florida civil court to not only uncover the truth of that fateful day, but also to recover costs and damages. Though none of this will bring back their vibrant 20-year-old daughter, they hope it will help save the lives of future travelers and loved ones.

A Deadly Family Vacation

In January of 2017, Abbey Conner and her brother, Austin, her mom and stepdad, took a winter vacation to the Mexican resort town of Playa del Carmen, and stayed at the upscale Hotel Iberostar Paraiso del Mar. Austin and Abbey had a few drinks at the pool bar while their mom and stepdad were spending time on their own.

When Austin and Abbey were late to meet for dinner, suspicions grew until the parents were given the news that their children had been taken to the hospital. Abbey had drowned under suspicious circumstances in a shallow area of the resort pool, shortly before dinner time. Austin was found unconscious in the pool with a large egg-sized lump on his head. Though the two were taken to the hospital, only one survived. Abbey was transported to a Florida hospital, where she never regained consciousness, was declared brain-dead, and subsequently died.

Over 200 Similar Incidents Reported

The family believes that Abbey and Austin consumed tainted alcohol at the resort pool. Austin has very little recollection of the events. His lack of memory is eerily similar to over 200 other Mexico vacation goers that have suffered similar fates to Austin, some after only one drink, leading many to believe the alcohol is tainted or that the guests are being drugged. Surprisingly, Abbey's parents have found that the U.S. and Mexico governments have been reticent in gathering and disseminating information regarding these incidents. They would like to learn why.

Wrongful Death Suit

Because it is believed that Abbey's death came as a result of tainted alcohol from the resort, her family has filed a wrongful death suit. The lawsuit alleges that Iberostar and its affiliated companies failed to take adequate safety measures, including preventing tainted alcohol from being served to guests, ensuring the bar and restaurant staff were properly trained, and providing adequate surveillance cameras and lifeguards around the pool. The suit also alleges that Iberostar failed to warn guests about the known threat of tainted alcohol, and refused to cooperate with the family's investigation of Abbey's death.

If you or someone you love believes they have been the victim of tainted alcohol or unknown drug use, call a personal injury attorney. Incidents such as these happen more often than the news reports, and you may be able to recover your costs, and in some cases, your confidence in the general public. But unfortunately for the Conner Family, some things you just can't get back.

Related Resources:

Injured?d=yIl2AUoC8zA Injured?d=qj6IDK7rITs Injured?i=Hhp9s3qA7aQ:lrrM6nU5TGA:gIN9vF


source http://blogs.findlaw.com/injured/2018/11/family-sues-mexico-resort-for-daughters-drowning.html

‘Tis the Season: Tech Toys for the Holidays 2018

Get ready to geek out over this wishlist of tech toys for the holidays! In this episode of The Digital Edge, hosts Sharon Nelson and Jim Calloway share their complete list of picks for the best new technology—some serious and some just plain fun. From a PhoneSoap sanitizer to a Marvel Thor’s Hammer tool set, there’s something for everyone on your list!

The post ‘Tis the Season: Tech Toys for the Holidays 2018 appeared first on Law Technology Today.

LawTechnologyTodayOrg?d=yIl2AUoC8zA LawTechnologyTodayOrg?d=qj6IDK7rITs


source http://www.lawtechnologytoday.org/2018/11/tech-toys-for-the-holidays/

Tuesday, November 27, 2018

Can a Dating Site Be Sued If Your Date Turns Dangerous?

It's hard to meet people these days, which is undoubtedly why there are so many dating apps currently on the market. But what if something goes wrong, like really wrong. Can you sue a dating app or website if your date turns out to be dangerous? Unfortunately, the answer may surprise you.

No Special Relationship Between Dating App and App Users

The Communications Decency Act generally bars liability of any dating app for harm happening from a third party user. Turning to state tort law and examining negligence, a duty of care only exists if there is a special relationship between the parties.

In a recent ruling in the Ninth Circuit, no special relationship exists between a dating app user and the app itself. Therefore, without a special relationship, no duty is owed. In that case, Mary Kay Beckman was viciously stabbed and beaten by Wade Riley, whom she was matched with on Match.com. Beckman argued that Match had a duty to warn her that her date was dangerous, but the courts disagreed. With no special relationship established between Match and Beckman, Match didn't even have a duty to warn, let alone any sort of duty to protect.

Actual Knowledge Can Be Hard to Come By

If, however, a dating app has actual knowledge that someone using their site has been found guilty of committing violent acts so similar that they would rise to the level of foreseeable harm, then it is possible there could be a duty to warn. Unfortunately, dating apps will not go out of their way to find this knowledge. For instance, in the Beckman case, Ridley did have a history of criminal violence, including domestic violence and battery about 10 years prior to this attack. However, Match was unaware of this criminal record and therefore did not have actual knowledge of foreseeable harm.

If you have been hurt, physically or psychologically, from someone you met on a dating app, contact a local personal injury attorney. There may be factors of which you are unaware that could give rise to a duty of care owed by the dating app. At the very least, a legal adviser can help you secure protective orders against your assailant, and may even be able to successfully sue to reimburse you for your costs, as well as pain and suffering.

Related Resources:

Injured?d=yIl2AUoC8zA Injured?d=qj6IDK7rITs Injured?i=MAIRLVY_8vE:LKxRfe-Q59w:gIN9vF


source http://blogs.findlaw.com/injured/2018/11/can-a-dating-site-be-sued-if-your-date-turns-dangerous.html

Digitally Transform with Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams is a powerful collaboration tool that can help accelerate digital transformation for all legal organizations. This article will explore the basics of Microsoft Teams and provide some possible use cases for Microsoft Teams for in-house legal departments, law firms, and other legal organizations.

Microsoft Teams makes teamwork easy and it is a complete chat and online meetings solution that was launched by Microsoft on a worldwide basis in March 2017. It is integrated with Microsoft’s Office 365 cloud solution and you can have anywhere and anytime access to Microsoft Teams via its desktop and mobile applications. Microsoft recently announced that Microsoft Teams is the fastest growing business application in Microsoft’s history as Teams is used by 329,000 organizations and 87 Fortune 100 companies. Microsoft Teams is also a global tool that supports 44 different languages.

While Microsoft Teams is a collaboration powerhouse and an alternative to traditional email, it is also very appealing for all legal organizations as it is built on the Microsoft Office 365 hyper-scale, enterprise-grade cloud solution and delivers the advanced security and compliance capabilities that law firms and in-house legal groups expect. For example, Microsoft Teams complies with many key compliance standards such as the following: ISO 27001, ISO 27018, SSAE16, SOC 1, and SOC 2. The platform also enforces team-wide and organization-wide two-factor authentication, single sign-on through Microsoft Active Directory, and encryption of data in transit and at rest.

Microsoft Teams is extremely easy and intuitive to use. In fact, I’ve created several teams with my Microsoft legal colleagues and business clients to help foster rich collaboration. With just a few clicks you can create a new team in Microsoft Teams by developing a team name, a description of the team and designating whether it is a public team (which anyone in your organization can join) or a private team (where you designate and control which individuals can join). Specific channels (which are like folders/tabs) on various subject matter areas can also be added to your team to help improve the organization of the information that is added to a team.

Once a new team is created, people who are members of that team can start posting and adding information to that team. The beauty of Microsoft Teams is that the information that is added to a team—whether it be messages, emails, videos, Word documents, information in OneNotes, PowerPoint slides, etc.—can be viewed by all members of that team, such information is stored in a repository-like fashion for future reference, team members can work together on edits/updates to such information while in Microsoft Teams and it is highly searchable. Such level of information transparency and access coupled with the many strong product features of Microsoft Teams can enable lawyers and legal professionals to be more productive and to engage in thoughtful ideation —regardless of where they are located.

Here are some use cases for Microsoft Teams to help legal organizations achieve more.

A Team for your Immediate Team

Consider establishing a team within Microsoft Teams to help ignite collaboration within the primary group that you are part of in your legal organization. For instance, as a member of Microsoft’s Corporate, External & Legal Affairs team, I am part of Microsoft’s legal field team that provides legal support to our sales organization across the United States. Our legal field team – which consists of 40+ lawyers and legal professionals scattered across the United States—has a Teams site that has served as our central hub for knowledge-sharing and we have several different channels incorporated into our Teams site. If you work at a law firm you can develop a Teams site for your specific legal practice group or perhaps sites that may be applicable to the law firm’s partners or associates in order to convey and exchange information with those specific stakeholders.

Cross Group Teams

Often, lawyers and legal professionals need to effectively partner with their colleagues who are not part of their immediate teams. For example, I need to work closely with my Microsoft legal teammates who are based in our corporate headquarters in Redmond, Washington, and colleagues who are in other parts of the world. Microsoft Teams is an excellent tool to help promote knowledge sharing among a cross-group team of lawyers and legal professionals within a legal organization.

Subject Matter Teams

There are also opportunities to create teams based on topical areas that are important to your legal organization. Those topical areas could be specific legal subject-matter areas (e.g., data privacy, employment law, intellectual property) to organizational specific (e.g., internal job opportunities, training, key internal points of contact) to other top of mind areas (e.g., diversity and inclusion, technology tools).

Teams with Your Business Clients

Developing a team with your primary business clients is a great way to build a trusted legal advisor relationship with them and to promote a better flow of significant information. You can use Microsoft Teams to seamlessly share knowledge with them, provide legal training on important areas and hopefully enable them to engage in more “self-help” on routine and repetitive legal matters in order to free up time for you and your legal organization to provide higher impact legal services.

Teams for Projects

Microsoft Teams is an excellent tool to use when you are engaged in special projects, initiatives or committees within your organization. I collaborate with several Microsoft legal teammates across our various different practice groups on such activities and we have created specific team sites for those activities which enables us to readily share, capture and create content in a modern collaboration format so that we can drive more positive impact for our business clients.

Teams for Events

Microsoft Teams is also ideal to use to share important information when your legal organization convenes key meetings or events. A specific teams site allows you to share and store the agenda, meeting notes, memos, next steps, etc…so that you can have more meaningful meetings and events.

Teams with Guests

Guest access is also available in Microsoft Teams to allows members of your organization to collaborate with people outside your organization by granting them access to teams and channels. This feature is terrific to enable deeper collaboration between in-house legal groups and their outside counsel law firms. Such team sites have a clear “This team has guests” designation near the name of the team site.

While this article is not meant to cover the breadth and depth of all of the capabilities of Microsoft Teams and possible use cases, hopefully, it provides you with some perspective on ways to embrace Microsoft Teams within your legal organization. Consider downloading today the free version of Microsoft Teams that is available worldwide in 40 languages so that you can begin using this modern collaboration tool to help you and your legal organization achieve more.

The post Digitally Transform with Microsoft Teams appeared first on Law Technology Today.

LawTechnologyTodayOrg?d=yIl2AUoC8zA LawTechnologyTodayOrg?d=qj6IDK7rITs


source http://www.lawtechnologytoday.org/2018/11/digitally-transform-with-microsoft-teams/

Monday, November 26, 2018

Lawsuit: Police Searched Wrong House, Cause $9K Damage

We've all heard stories of mistaken identity, but this is the case of a house's mistaken identity. One family is suing the police department for searching the wrong residence described in a search warrant.


Right Suspect, Wrong House

Last November, a young boy was shot in a drive-by shooting in Cleveland. In an attempt to find evidence against the shooter, Judge Sherrie Miday signed a search warrant, based on probable cause, for a house allegedly belonging to Larissa Harris, one of the shooting suspects, in the 16000 block of Lipton Avenue, as well as a vehicle belonging to the suspect. But in fact, the warrant detailed the wrong house, that of the plaintiff, Paula Mitchell, who lived across the street from Harris.

Faulty Warrant Could Have Been Cured With Adequate Surveillance

According to the plaintiff, the warrant detailed the wrong house, since it "failed to describe the actual residence that police should have surveilled." Additionally, the lawsuit claims this mistake could have been corrected, since the warrant had a three-day window period, more than sufficient to determine the correct house to raid, according to plaintiffs. The lawsuit claims that the police should have "exercised reasonable care and due diligence through investigation, to make certain that they were surveilling and ultimately searching the correct residence."

Police Sued for Searching Wrong House With Wreckless Abandon

When the police began the raid, Harris told the police they had the wrong house, but they refused to listen. Instead, plaintiffs claim the police violated their duty of care by searching the wrong house and then acting with "reckless abandon," causing $9,000 in damages and inflicting emotional distress. As a result, the lawsuit accuses Cleveland Police Detective David Borden and 10 unnamed Cleveland police officers of one count of negligent, malicious, wanton and reckless conduct. Mitchell is seeking more than $25,000 in actual and punitive damages.

If you or someone you love has been the victim of a warrantless search, and suffered monetary damages as a result, contact a local personal injury attorney. You may be able to recover for your losses, and potentially send a message to the police about the care that should be used when conducting a search.

Related Resources:

Injured?d=yIl2AUoC8zA Injured?d=qj6IDK7rITs Injured?i=bCK-7GxcQG4:ht001OLLLZc:gIN9vF


source http://blogs.findlaw.com/injured/2018/11/lawsuit-police-searched-wrong-house-cause-9k-damage.html

Use Firm Central to Manage Your Solo Practice

Before Steve Little decided to open his solo legal practice, SRL Law, PLLC, in Minneapolis, he knew he needed a practice-management system that was more efficient and cost-effective than the disjointed system used by the law firm he was leaving. That firm employed a small army of support staff to conduct legal research, manage casework, maintain calendars, keep track of court dates, log time and expenses, bill clients, file paperwork, and everything else. Steve was only going to be an army of one, so he needed all the help he could get. A hands-on presentation of Thomson Reuters Firm Central practice-management suite convinced him it might be exactly the kind of help he was looking for, and he’s been using it to run his successful practice ever since.

“When I learned that document management, legal research, and billing were all integrated into Firm Central, that interested me,” Steve recalls. “I wanted to have one program I could turn on in the morning and use.”

Steve wanted to spend as little time as possible on the administrative side of his business so that he could concentrate his attention and energy on getting new clients and serving them better.

“When I was using three different systems for case-file document management, billing, and legal research, it took a lot more time out of my day,” Steve said.

Steve’s legal practice is in the contract-intensive area of real estate and business law, so document-management capabilities are a top priority. Version control and tracking of documents exchanged back and forth multiple times was a process Steve knew he had to get a handle on.

“My old firm didn’t have practice management software,” which caused problems, Steve said. “If multiple attorneys worked on a document, brief, or memo, it was challenging and time-consuming to track all the changes and stay abreast of the most current version.”

Business Anytime, Anywhere

With Firm Central on his desktop, these issues are no longer a concern for Steve. Because it was developed with solo attorneys and small law firms in mind, Firm Central integrates everything a lawyer needs to manage their practice into a single, easy-to-use platform.

Furthermore, Firm Central is a cloud-based solution in which everything is stored automatically in a secure, encrypted environment accessible only to lawyers and their clients. And because it is cloud-based, Firm Central provides access to case files, research, billingand everything else24/7, on any device.

“Having it in the cloud, accessible from all my devices, has been really helpful to me,” Steve says. “In court, I don’t have to bring a briefcase full of documents, and I can access them faster on my iPad.”

Steve also likes the flexibility Firm Central gives him to work anytime, anywhere. “I could be on a beach in Bermuda and be as productive as I am in my physical office downtown,” he says. The mobile version of Firm Central is so well designed that “accessing Firm Central from my phone is just like being in my office.”

Firm Central’s easy setup, dedicated implementation team, and 24/7 tech support meant no outside IT person was required. Thomson Reuters gave him all the training and support he needed to get up and running, he says. But not a lot of training was needed.

“I got Firm Central on the first day I opened my practice,” Steve says. “I turned on my computer that morning and was able to start using it right away. It was pretty intuitive.”

Robust Features and Encrypted Sharing

Virtually every area of Steve’s practice can be accessed through the software, and the interface is designed to make the complexities of day-to-day legal work easier to manage. The robust Firm Central organizational and document management capabilities are among Steve’s favorite features. Not only is it easy to keep track of documents by matter and client, but the software also gives lawyers like Steve all kinds of time-saving options. “I really like that I can create separate folders for, say, pleadingsand then for filed pleadings,” Steve says. “When I open something that’s been accepted by the court, I just click save and it goes directly into the correct folder I select.” Legal research is another area where Firm Central saves Steve a great deal of time and effort. Firm Central is integrated directly with Thomson Reuters Westlaw, so the connection between specific casework and research is seamless.

“If I’m working on legal research in Westlaw and I see a case I like, I can directly save that case into the folder for my client in Firm Central,” Steve says.

Furthermore, since Firm Central has an encrypted sharing platform, exchanging documents and research with clients is easy and secure through the client portal. Time tracking and billing are another necessary evil that Firm Central deals with particularly well.

“With Firm Central, there’s a timer in the software, so if I’m working on a brief, I can keep track of how much time I’m spending on that particular project. Or when I get off the phone with someone, I can just type in the time,” Steve says.

When he needs to send a bill, the time spent on the client’s case is already recorded and automatically imported into their invoice. “I think my clients can tell the difference,” Steve says. “My billing statements are timely and they look professional. And the ability to send professionally created documents saves me and my clients so much time. I’m much more efficient.”

Save Time and Expenses

As a solo practitioner, the cost has always been one of Steve’s top concerns. He says he was initially afraid that Firm Central would be too expensive for him, but when he compared the cost to purchasing and running three separate programs, he realized that Firm Central would save him money.

And it has. In addition to the up-front cost savings, Steve estimates that using Firm Central saves him about 20 hours of administrative time each monthtime he can spend working for clients, building new business, or just being with his family.

“Firm Central has cut my overhead costs by more than 50%,” Steve says. “It’s a great tool for solo practitioners. I can do everything myself, so I don’t need to hire staff.”

A Most Valuable Business Partner

Firm Central was designed specifically to help lawyers in solo practices and small firms manage their day-to-day challenges; a way to level the playing field against larger firms with deeper pockets and more resources. Time is a lawyer’s most precious resource, of course, and Firm Central helps lawyers like Steve make the most of theirs.

Steve started using Firm Central the day he hung out his shingle, and it has become his most valuable business partner. Not only does it save him time and money, but it also helps him be a better lawyer. With all his business processesdocument management, research, time tracking, billing, calendaring, formsintegrated into a single, cloud-based platform that’s accessible 24/7 from any device, anywhere, Steve can focus more of his energy and attention on his clients. In turn, he’s able to serve them better. And better service, he knows, is the key to his ongoing success.

The post Use Firm Central to Manage Your Solo Practice appeared first on Law Technology Today.

LawTechnologyTodayOrg?d=yIl2AUoC8zA LawTechnologyTodayOrg?d=qj6IDK7rITs


source http://www.lawtechnologytoday.org/2018/11/use-firm-central-to-manage-your-solo-practice/

Friday, November 23, 2018

Can you make a personal injury claim if you slip on snow and ice?

As the temperatures plunge and our heating bills soar, we often hear about the unfortunate accidents that people have after slipping on ice and snow around the country.

So, as we are often asked, can you make a personal injury claim if you slip on snow and ice and suffer an injury?

Well, it depends…

It is a curiosity, and something of an injustice that the law works differently depending on exactly where your accident took place.

Accidents on public roads, footpaths, or open spaces

Sadly, you will be unlikely to succeed with a claim against a local authority if you slip on snow or ice (or anything else lying on the ground for that matter, like leaves or mud). The Courts have decided that it is unreasonable to expect a local authority to lay grit and remove snow and ice from every footpath and road, which, let’s face it, would be almost impossible. Under section 41 of the Highways Act 1980, the Highway Authority has a responsibility to ensure “so far as is reasonably practicable, that safe passage along a highway is not endangered by snow or ice”.

In other words, although they have a responsibility to see that icy paths and highways are made safe by gritting or other means, in the event of an accident, the Highway Authority is judged by the Courts on a standard of what is “reasonably practicable.” The mere presence of ice, snow or frost on the pavements which leads to the accident is unlikely to be enough in itself for a Court to find the local authority at fault as the Courts accept that it is not “reasonably practicable” for a Council to clear snow and ice from each and every road and footpath after each snowfall.

Accidents on private land (e.g. land belonging to car parks, hotels, shops or leisure centres)

Imagine you are making your way across the car park of a large supermarket when you slip on ice and fall. The law imposes a higher duty on the owner of the supermarket, under the Occupiers’ Liability Act of 1957, than it imposes on a local authority. That said, it’s not completely straightforward. Continuing the supermarket example, it is clear that supermarket X has to take reasonable care that customers are kept reasonably safe when visiting their premises.

When considering claims, Courts look at each one on its own merits and assess whether or not supermarket X acted reasonably by looking at the facts of the particular accident. For example, the Judge might consider if the area had been gritted, whether warning signs were in place, whether there had been a weather warning of snow and ice which was not heeded by supermarket X, and how long the ice/snow/frost that caused the incident had been present.

Accidents at work

There are various technical pieces of legislation that make up the law in this area, but, in a nutshell, your employer has to take reasonable steps to keep you safe at work. This means, in reality, making sure that walkways and steps are cleared and/or gritted if there is snow or ice, and if they cannot be gritted, they must be cordoned off.

So the prospects of a successful personal injury claim are generally highest if your slip on ice or snow occurs on your employer’s land. If the accident is on privately owned land, the prospects are generally reasonable, depending on the circumstances, but if it is on a road, footpath or other land owned and/or maintained by a Local Authority, then the chances of succeeding are very low.

If you have had a slip on ice, snow or frost, and would like some advice about whether you can make a claim, then call our expert Solicitors on 0114 218 4000 or email info@tayloremmet.co.uk

Remember, if possible:

  • Take lots of photos of where your accident happened.
  • If you go to hospital or the GP, explain exactly how your accident occurred.
  • If your accident occurs at work or on private land, complete an accident report.
  • Get the details of any witnesses.

The post Can you make a personal injury claim if you slip on snow and ice? appeared first on The Personal Injury Blog.



source https://www.tayloremmet.co.uk/blog/wordpress/personal-injury-claim-slip-on-snow-ice/

New York E-filing Webinar

It’s been almost two decades since New York first introduced eFiling and lawyers are still trying to find a better way to use this technology. The problem with technology, especially legal technology, is that it doesn’t play well with others.

For example, eFiling into NYSCEF is a huge step forward for saving costs and allowing attorneys to work and eFile from anywhere.  However, you end up doing more work by retyping party information, converting documents to PDF, saving and uploading documents, and making sure you track all the costs manually.  You find yourself spending more time eFiling than walking to the court house because the technology was developed in a vacuum. What’s the point of technology if it doesn’t help you be a better lawyer?

The best practice or case management systems allow you to leverage the information you’ve already entered with document automation, time tracking and other integrated services such as E-filing. In our New York E-Filing Webinar, you’ll discover how to keep all of your client information, documents, calendars, emails and billing data all in one place.

Join us:

Wednesday, November 28th
2:00pm – 2:30pm ET

Free Registration

Learning Objectives:

  • Effectively implementing a practice management software in boutique law firms
  • Understanding E-filing requirements in New York
  • How to reduce errors in E-filing by simplifying the E-filing process
  • How to integrate E-filing with your practice management software

Sponsored by:

Speakers:

Natasha Malinsky –  Boutique Law Firm Practice Management Specialist at LEAP

Natasha is a Boutique Law Firm Practice Management Specialist with LEAP. Natasha has been assisting small law firms throughout the state of New York for several years. Natasha understands the struggles of running a business and enjoys working with other small businesses to increase efficiency and profitability.

Eunbin Rii – VP of Product Development at InfoTrack

Eunbin Rii is the Vice President of Product Development at InfoTrack, an E-filing software solution. Eunbin has also served as Litigation Counsel for ARDC, the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, investigating and prosecuting attorneys for professional misconduct. Eunbin received his JD cum laude from Loyola University Chicago School of Law.

The post New York E-filing Webinar appeared first on Law Technology Today.

LawTechnologyTodayOrg?d=yIl2AUoC8zA LawTechnologyTodayOrg?d=qj6IDK7rITs


source http://www.lawtechnologytoday.org/2018/11/new-york-e-filing-webinar/

Wednesday, November 21, 2018

Microsoft Office 2019: Your Law Firm’s Efficient Marketing Partner

While it’s common for law firms and lawyers to believe that their expertise and reputation are enough to attract clients, they need an effective marketing strategy. Strong marketing can help your law firm set itself apart from the competition and attract more clients. The newly-released Microsoft Office 2019 includes some tools you can use to improve your law firm’s marketing strategies. Here’s how you can use it to your advantage.

Use Outlook’s Email Management Tools to Expand Your Online Footprint

Email marketing is among the brilliant ways of staying in front of existing and potential clients across fields such as law. In the US, over 90% of adults use email while 70% of them actively redeem discounts or coupons from a marketing email. Email marketing is among the most affordable forms of legal advertising out there. To capitalize on its benefits, you need a reliable email management program.

The new Microsoft Outlook on Office 2019 comes with several email management tools. They include updated contact cards, a focused inbox, Office 365 Groups, @mentions, and travel package cards. You can rely on the focused mailbox to prioritize on your most important emails. The updated contact cards help you sort out your email list, which may comprise your newsletter subscribers.

Improve Your Marketing with Excel’s Tracking, Reporting, and Analytics Tools

To avoid wasting resources on ineffective advertising strategies, consider measuring and tracking all your ad campaigns. As you do this, find out the policies that seem to work and those that you need to change or eliminate. The key performance indicators (KPIs) in a law firm’s marketing strategy include revenue, leads, total new clients and return on marketing investments. They also include cost per lead, booking rate (from calls) and lead-to-sale conversion rate.

A program such as Excel can help you track, report, and analyze your advertising strategies using the KPIs. The new Excel software on Office 2019 helps manipulate numeric data from your advertising strategies and draw meaningful relationships from it. Tools such as funnel charts and 2D maps give you the freedom of displaying the data in a compact visual layout.

Use the Improved Inking Features to Create Valuable Content

Including valuable content in your marketing campaign increases your chances of winning over clients. The information helps clients who desperately want to know the services that your law firm provides. You can create it different forms depending on what it entails and the targeted audience.

Office 2019 has improved inking features that allow you to create marketing content on a Microsoft Surface device. They included increased pressure sensitivity and tilt effects. The software suite enables you to use a digital pen to launch and work with your favorite utility programs. You can use the digital pen/stylus on a Microsoft Surface device to come up with content in the form of text, drawings, and doodles that articulate your law firm’s goals and services.

Use PowerPoint’s Advanced Presentation Features

Though pictures can help improve your law firm’s branding, videos help sell the deal and gain new clients. You can use PowerPoint on the Office 2019 Suite to create marketing campaigns that include videos and pictures. According to Infogram, over 1 billion people use PowerPoint on their Windows devices. The new PowerPoint features a Morph tool that lets you create smooth animations.

The new PowerPoint is handy when pitching a marketing proposal to colleagues or board members. The software allows you to create engaging and multimedia-supported presentations. You can rely on it to convince your law firm’s board members or investors to buy into your upcoming ad campaign.

Create Specialized Pages for Each Service Using Visio Wireframe

Most law firms offer different services or have multiple specialties. For instance, one that specializes in family law may facilitate custody arrangements, estate planning, prenuptial/postnuptial agreements, and divorce services. For the best results, use a drop-down menu on your site to make each specialty clear. You get an average conversion rate of 4.8% when you include videos on the specialized pages.

The Visio Wireframe included in Office 2019 is one of the tools you can use to create specialized pages on your site. The program features multiple templates for designing mobile applications and websites. Each model has five stencils including containers, controls, media, text, and navigation. Besides designing landing pages, you can use Visio Wireframe to bring any marketing idea for a law firm to life.

Improve Your Content Marketing Strategies with the New Translate Tool

The content on your website affects your firm’s chances of landing new clients. Always view your site as a core digital marketing tool meant to encourage prospective clients to work with your law firm. Build a blog to show your authority on legal matters and to improve your website’s ranking on search engines. Create an FAQ (frequently asked questions) page that responds to the common queries that potential clients ask.

Office 2019 features a translation tool known as Translate that can let you create content that breaks the language barrier. You can use it on Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and OneNote when creating content for your site’s blog or FAQ page. Translate also lets you check the grammar and spelling in a different language.

Final Thoughts

With the new tools included in Microsoft Office 2019, you can come up with ads that help you keep up with your competitors. The campaigns aim at increasing your conversion rates and maintaining your credibility in the legal services market. Note that Office 2019 gives you the tools you need to stay relevant in your field.

The post Microsoft Office 2019: Your Law Firm’s Efficient Marketing Partner appeared first on Law Technology Today.

LawTechnologyTodayOrg?d=yIl2AUoC8zA LawTechnologyTodayOrg?d=qj6IDK7rITs


source http://www.lawtechnologytoday.org/2018/11/microsoft-office-2019-your-law-firms-efficient-marketing-partner/

Walgreens, CVS Sued for Opioid Sales in Florida

Florida added Walgreens and CVS to the lawsuit it filed last spring against Purdue Pharma and several opioid distributors. Attorney General Pam Bondi claims these chains played a major role in creating the opioid crisis that has rocked not only Florida, but most of the Eastern United States by allowing its pharmacists to fill suspicious or unreasonable opioid prescriptions.

By the Numbers

The opioid crisis is still in full swing. According to the Center for Disease Control, about 45 people each day die from opioid overdoses. But how can that be tied to Walgreens and CVS? The circumstantial evidence is quite compelling. The lawsuit states that Walgreens distributed 2.2 million opioid tablets in just one month from its Hudson store, located in a town of just 12,000 inhabitants.

And there are other Florida Walgreens with similar ratios, including some whose opioid sales have jumped six-fold over the last two years. CVS numbers aren't as convincing, but it too has disproportionate sales in the town of Hudson. The concept is that drug dealers would send associates to get prescriptions for opioids from local doctors, get them filled, and then sell the pills on the black market through a distribution system that spans the eastern states. Shockingly, at one point in the early 2000's, 90 percent of the nation's top opioid prescribing doctors were from Florida.

Walgreens Previously Fined for Similar Issue by DEA

In 2013, Walgreens paid $80 million in fines to resolve a Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) inquiry into its "unprecedented number" of inadequate record keeping and dispensing violation of opioid sales in its Florida pharmacies. CVS faced a similar problem with the DEA in 2015, and agreed to pay $22 million. It is believed that because inadequate records were kept, pharmacists were not able to abide by the law, which states that pharmacists must refuse to fill prescriptions they suspect are for an invalid purpose, such as being resold on the black market.

CVS Claims The Crisis Isn't Their Fault

Though Walgreens hasn't commented on the suit, CVS has stated there's no way they are responsible. "Over the past several years, CVS has taken numerous actions to strengthen our existing safeguards to help address the nation's opioid epidemic," CVS spokesperson Mike DeAngelis said. The company claims it has trained its pharmacists to detect potentially illegal sales and has instructed them on their corresponding legal responsibility.

Stay tuned to find out if more companies will be added to this lawsuit, and if further evidence will come to light tying a firmer causal connection between plaintiffs and the opioid crisis.

Related Resources:

Injured?d=yIl2AUoC8zA Injured?d=qj6IDK7rITs Injured?i=68Zz2kf3kVs:GrDSQ92g_4o:gIN9vF


source http://blogs.findlaw.com/injured/2018/11/walgreens-cvs-sued-for-opioid-sales-in-florida.html